Test Results

 20 files  ±0  265 suites  ±0   18m 21s ⏱️ -12s
712 tests  - 2  707 ✅ +1  5 💤 ±0  0 ❌  - 3 
728 runs  ±0  723 ✅ +3  5 💤 ±0  0 ❌  - 3 

Results for commit 9356d97. ± Comparison against base commit 6cbad23.

"after all" hook in "@release @web-socket-batch-1 eth_blockNumber" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @release @web-socket-batch-1 eth_blockNumber "after all" hook in "@release @web-socket-batch-1 eth_blockNumber"
"after all" hook in "@web-socket-batch-2 eth_newFilter" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @web-socket-batch-2 eth_newFilter "after all" hook in "@web-socket-batch-2 eth_newFilter"

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Looks like there's a lint issue.

Looks like there's a lint issue.

Yes, I just uncommented some previously commented code, but it’s a good chance to clean it up as well.

I am slighlty confused by the description. Batch 2 was deleted or? May you update the description to something more informative

@konstantinabl sure! Is current description good enough:

#4110 (comment)
?

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4110      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.39%   95.67%   +0.27%     
==========================================
  Files         122      121       -1     
  Lines       20996    20103     -893     
  Branches     1750     1739      -11     
==========================================
- Hits        20030    19233     -797     
+ Misses        944      845      -99     
- Partials       22       25       +3     

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 50 files with indirect coverage changes

@konstantinabl sure! Is current description good enough:

#4110 (comment) ?

@arianejasuwienas absolutely, reviewing now : ) thanks!